Such a report can indeed be produced. We have a model proposal to carry out this task. The proposed model aims to give a degree of efficiency to the social institution we wish to improve. From that starting point, the optimisation function within the Qualitative Engine will provide a guide to improvements. The model in question is the following:
Social institution efficiency (Zeros)
Municipal sensitivity (Direct extreme)
1-Degree of understanding of SS entries in municipal budget (Direct extreme)
2-Economic support for households (Direct extreme)
3-Infant support in situations of poverty (Ones)
4-The number of households hoped to be dealt with, on an economic level (Direct extreme)
5-The number of persons from SS dedicated to dealing with households (Direct extreme)
6-The indirect entries involved which affect households (Direct extreme)
Quality of planning (Direct extreme)
7-Knowledge on the situation regarding poverty in the municipality (Direct average indeterminate)
8-Quality in planning basic household support (Direct extreme)
9-Analysis of direct support services for infant issues (Direct extreme)
10-Analysis of services provided in support for labour reinsertion (Direct extreme)
11-Planning of actions with other departments from the town hall (Direct high indeterminate)
12-Planning of actions with external agencies that work with poverty (Direct high indeterminate)
Quality of execution (Direct extreme)
13-Degree of satisfaction among beneficiaries of direct attention (Direct average indeterminate)
14-Evaluation of the impact of services on the beneficiaries (Direct extreme)
15-Strategies to improve planning based on impact (Direct high indeterminate)
16-The presence of beneficiaries in the strategy for improvement (Direct extreme)
17-Efficiency of coordination with town hall departments linked to poverty (Direct average indeterminate)
18-Efficiency of coordination with social agents in the municipality (Direct medium indeterminate)
Level of communication (Direct extreme)
19-Discussion of the social budget, in order to obtain the city's opinion regarding approval (Direct extreme)
20-Communication in relation to the execution of the budget in SS (Zeros)
21-Communication regarding services and beneficiaries attended to periodically (Direct high indeterminate)
22-Communication regarding known deficiencies and the outlook for improvements (Direct extreme)
23-Channels established for the reception of citizens' opinions regarding poverty (Direct extreme)
Based on this model we can carry out an analysis for subsequent optimisation. For example, from this analysis:
GESTIÓ DE
CONEIXEMENT SOCIAL
© 2017 . GESTIÓ DE CONEIXEMENT SOCIAL SL